Change Details

Currently, they're all using different ways of parsing the XML, and it would be nice to unify these into something more sane

Currently, they're all using different ways of parsing the XML, and it would be nice to unify these into something more sane Additionally, and more importantly, `xpni.Current.GetAttribute(...)` returns `string.Empty` in **two** cases: a) when the attribute is defined as an empty string, b) when the attribute is not defined. This causes issues for the attributes such as `missing=""` which are placed on MW API datasets where the requested item is missing.

Currently, they're all using different ways of parsing the XML, and it would be nice to unify these into something more sane Additionally, and more importantly, `xpni.Current.GetAttribute(...)` returns `string.Empty` in **two** cases: a) when the attribute is defined as an empty string, b) when the attribute is not defined. This causes issues for the attributes such as `missing=""` which are placed on MW API datasets where the requested item is missing.